SNPwatch: Factors Influencing Permanent Tooth Development

Editor’s note: Pending an FDA decision, 23andMe no longer offers new customers access to health reports referred to in this post. Customers who purchased prior to November 22, 2013 will still be able to see their health reports, but those who purchased after that time will not. Those customers will have access to ancestry information as well as access to their uninterpreted raw data.

Anyone who’s ever spent time around babies knows that teething can be disruptive and often painful. In that sense, the somewhat violent term “tooth eruption”—referring to the process of teeth breaking through the gums—seems rather appropriate. Most people experience this phenomenon twice, first when baby teeth come in and again between six and 13 years of age when permanent teeth appear. Some people also have wisdom teeth, which are molars that develop in young adults.

While tooth development can be influenced by environmental factors, genetics also plays a role in both the timing of tooth emergence as well as the number of teeth a person ends up with. Subtle differences in tooth development are very common—for instance roughly 10% of the population is missing some teeth.

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) published in PLoS Genetics this month by researchers in Denmark has now identified genetic factors associated with the emergence of permanent teeth. They analyzed DNA from nearly 9,000 individuals in Denmark and the United States, and found four SNPs that influenced the timing and number of visible teeth at various ages. The G version at *, the T version at , the T version at , and the G version at were all associated with having slightly fewer teeth at 10-12 years of age.

(23andMe customers can view their data for these SNPs using the Browse Raw Data feature, or view their results in the Tooth Development Preliminary Research report in their account.)

For at least three of these SNPs (, , ), the version associated with fewer teeth is relatively common in the population. And although the individual effects of the variants are small—correlated with about half to one tooth fewer, on average—they did seem to add up. In this study, someone with two copies of the “delayed tooth eruption” version at all four SNPs had about six fewer teeth (16 teeth) at 10-12 years of age compared to someone with no copies of the delayed versions (22 teeth). Interestingly, a study published a few years ago showed that two of these SNPs might also play a role in the eruption of baby teeth.

Some genetic factors contribute to multiple growth-related traits, so the authors tested if the tooth development SNPs were also linked to traits such as age at menarche (first period in young women) and adult height. In general, the genetic factors underlying these traits did not overlap. There was, however, weak evidence suggesting that several of the SNPs associated with permanent tooth development also influence adult height and breast cancer. More research is needed to determine the exact biological mechanisms linking these different traits.

This study represents the first GWAS to look for genetic factors involved in permanent tooth eruption. Studies like this one are interesting because they reveal that there is clearly natural variation across the population—some individuals have more teeth while others have less. These findings also highlight the complex interplay between genetic factors involved in human growth and development.

(* is equivalent to reported in the paper. 23andMe customers who were genotyped on earlier versions of our genotyping chip can look up their data for .)

SNPwatch gives you the latest news about research linking various traits and conditions to individual genetic variations. These studies are exciting because they offer a glimpse into how genetics may affect our bodies and health; but in most cases, more work is needed before this research can provide information of value to individuals. For that reason it is important to remember that like all information we provide, the studies we describe in SNPwatch are for research and educational purposes only. SNPwatch is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice; you should always seek the advice of your physician or other appropriate healthcare professional with any questions you may have regarding diagnosis, cure, treatment or prevention of any disease or other medical condition.

  • Tina

    I still have one baby tooth at age 52. The permanent tooth never emerged. My father, now 73, still has one baby tooth. Both my father and I never had upper wisdom teeth.
    Both our heights are slightly on the shorter side – mine is 5’3″, and his 5’8″. I have no records of timing for tooth eruption. I have never had breast cancer.

Return to top