New Study on Genetics of Ethnic Groups Reveals We May Not Be So Different After All


There are many examples around the world of two distinct ethnic groups living side by side.Sometimes these groups co-exist peacefully. Other times they do not.Often two groups’ differences – along with circumstantial factors – lead to tension between them and sometimes violence. The Hutus and Tutsis of Rwanda, the Sunnis and Shiites of Iraq, and the Croats and Serbs of former Yugoslavia all illustrate how cultural distinctions – like language and religion – can contribute to tensions and conflict around the globe.But do these cultural and ethnic distinctions translate to biological distinctions as well? Exactly how biologically distinct are two ethnic groups living side by side? Anthropologist Evelyn Heyer and an international team of researchers set out to answer these and many other questions by studying the adjacent – and culturally very different – Tajik and Turkic speakers along the Silk Road of Central Asia. Their results are published in this week’s BMC Genetics.The authors focused on the Tajik and Turkic speakers because those groups offered a unique perspective on how two groups living in such close proximity can be so different from each other.The Turks are largely nomadic herders. They speak Indo-Iranian languages like Azerbaijani, Turkish, and Altay. Their society is organized into clans, or “descent groups,” whose membership is passed down from father to children.The Tajiks are, conversely, agriculturalists. They speak various dialects of the the Tajik, or Tajik Persian, language that may have arrived with Muslim invaders 1,000 years ago. Their society is largely patrilocal – meaning that when couples marry they put up residence near the husband’s family; and first cousin marriages are encouraged.The two societies are supposedly closed, and members of both groups are said to rarely leave their clan or village. This cultural isolation made them perfect candidates for Heyer and her team to study.So the researchers collected both maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA and paternally inherited Y chromosome DNA from more than 1,000 individuals spanning 24 Turkic and Tajik populations.What they found was that these two ethnic groups weren’t so different after all.Genetically, the Tajiks and the Turks were virtually indistinguishable. The authors found the overall level of genetic diversity between the two groups to be less than 1% overall – so small that there was a greater amount of diversity within each group than between the two.Their analysis also shed some light on the origins of these these two ethnic groups. The modern-day people of Central Asia maintain their own origin stories that are unique to their particular group. In part, it is these unique origin stories that distinguish them from one another. But Heyer’s analysis proves that these groups actually share the same roots; they are simply a hodgepodge of the clans, tribes, and villages that have called Central Asia their home for thousands of years. Over many generations they banded together to form larger groups until they consolidated into just two major divisions: the Tajiks and the Turks.
  • Najibullah Aziz

    Very well written article. The more simplified version of the published results by BMC genetics. However, there was a technical problem on an issue in this article.

    Anne H says, ” The Turks are largely nomadic herders. They speak Indo-Iranian languages like Azerbaijani, Turkish, and Altay. Their society is organized into clans, or “descent groups,” whose membership is passed down from father to children.”, which is not correct. In fact, the Turks speak Ural-Altaic languages as the examples been given above.

    With Regards

  • Anonymous

    The Tajik (Persian) language has been with us for millenniums.

    Please don’t make nonsense up.

  • Sohrab

    What a shallow research that is. Turks from Turkey and Azeris from Azerbaijan have considerable differences with, say Kazakhs and Uzbeks, although they all speak Ural-Altaic (NOT Indo-Iranian) languages. Due to the density of population in the area, Turkic migrations only managed to replace the language in Turkey and Caucasus (Azeris are virtually indistinguishable from Iranians, being originally Iranian people themselves), meanwhile settling in large numbers in the plains of Central Asia. One cannot deny that due to assimilation, there is a large group among Tajiks and Uzbeks that carry similar genetic make-up. However, there is also a considerable majority within these groups that bear noticeable genetic differences – uzbeks from areas like Jizzak for example, with strong Turko-Mongol component and Tajiks from Khodjent or the Pamirs, with strong genetic marker indicating Iranian ancestry.

  • Jamal Al-Afghani

    With all due respect, The “Tajiks” from khojand are not really Tajik at all but rather Kyrgyz people who adopted Tajik identity.

  • Nafisa Hasanova

    The post needs to be corrected, Turkic languages are not Indo-European, Tajik is. To assume that Tajik came in to the region with muslim invaders, shows how little the author knows the history of the region. Most of the pre-Islamic languages spoken in the region belong to the Iranian language groups, such as Sogdian and Persian.