SNPwatch gives you the latest news about research linking various traits and conditions to individual genetic variations. These studies are exciting because they offer a glimpse into how genetics may affect our bodies and health; but in most cases, more work is needed before this research can provide information of value to individuals. For that reason it is important to remember that like all information we provide, the studies we describe in SNPwatch are for research and educational purposes only. SNPwatch is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice; you should always seek the advice of your physician or other appropriate healthcare professional with any questions you may have regarding diagnosis, cure, treatment or prevention of any disease or other medical condition.here).Discerning the effect of a single genetic variation in such a noisy environment requires multiple studies involving large numbers of subjects. The latest study, published online last week by Human Molecular Genetics, looked at 379,319 SNPs in 1,000 people of European descent.The study found statistically significant associations with height for 134 SNPs. The researchers focused on about two dozen that clustered around two genes that had not previously been associated with height, SBF2 and FLNB.FLNB is plausible as a height-associated gene, because it is involved in skeletal development. Though SBF2 is not as clearly related to height, mutations in the gene are known to cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, which causes muscle weakness and skeletal deformities in the limbs.The effect of SBF2 was surprisingly large – subjects with the TT genotype at one SNP in the gene, rs1867138, were about an inch taller on average than those with the CC genotype. Though the effect of FLNB was less impressive, the study found that each G at the the SNP rs9834312 in that gene slightly increased a subject’s height.23andMe customers can check their genotypes at two equivalent SNPs using the Browse Raw Data feature. Having a G at rs1867137 is the same as having a T at rs1867138. So the GG genotype at rs1867137 is worth about an inch compared to AA. In FLNB, rs939882 is equivalent to rs9834312. In both cases, having a G is correlated with slightly greater height.When the researchers attempted to replicate their findings in Chinese subjects, they found that both genes were associated with height in that population as well – but not all of it. The SNP in FLNB was associated with height among 619 northern Chinese subjects, while the SNP in SBF2 was associated with height only in a sample of 2,953 southern Chinese.But when the researchers tried to replicate previously discovered height associations using their data, their results were mixed. Out of 58 they looked for, only 13 showed up. That doesn’t necessarily mean the 45 associations that could not be replicated are invalid; but it does illustrate how difficult it will be to work out the genetic basis of height.